Pemra’s counsel Haroon Duggal said this during the hearing of a petition filed by the founder of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) last year against Pemra’s decision to bar all TV channels from airing Imran’s speeches and press conferences.
The hearing was presided over by Justice Shams Mehmood Mirza.
After the hearing, Justice Mirza directed the media regulatory body to not pressure TV channels over barring the broadcast of Imran’s speeches.
On March 5, 2023, the regulatory body imposed a blanket ban on broadcasting live or recorded speeches of the former premier on all satellite TV channels.
“It has been observed that Mr Imran Khan, Chairman of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf, in his speeches/statements is continuous. leveling baseless allegations and spreading hate speech through his provocative statements against state institutions and officers which is prejudicial to the maintenance of law and order and is likely to disturb public peace and tranquillity,” the order issued by the media regulatory authority read.
The next day the former chairman of PTI filed a petition in the LHC challenging the Pemra’s prohibition order.
LHC directs PEMRA to ensure freedom of speech
The petition, filed through barrister Muhammed Ahmed Pansota, had contended that in the judgment reported as “Imran Ahmad Khan Niazi Vs PEMRA”, then Chief Justice of the Islamabad High Court (IHC) Athar Minallah had declared a similar PEMRA prohibition order as “ultra vires the Ordinance” (over-stretching itself beyond the powers conferred upon it) on similar grounds.
Imran’s counsel had stated in the petition that PEMRA had issued the impugned order beyond their jurisdiction and without having regard to the constitutional rights guaranteed under Articles 19 and 19-A of the Constitution.
On March 9, 2023, Justice Mirza, presiding over the hearing, suspended the ban imposed by the media regulatory authority.
It should be noted that the Pemra had also imposed a prohibition order against airing Imran’s live or recorded speeches on August 21, 2022, after the PTI chief had warned Islamabad’s inspector general police (IG) and deputy inspector general police (DIG) in which he had said that he Would not spare them and would register a case against them for “torturing” party leader Shahbaz Gill during his physical remand.
He had also called out Additional District and Sessions Judge (ADSJ) Zeba Chaudhry for approving the police request of physical remand despite knowing that Gill was subjected to “torture”. “We will not leave you [Zeba] and will also file a case against her.”