Judge Denies Imran Khan’s Bail Over May 9 Violence Allegations
ATC Judge Khalid Arshad issued a detailed order of the dismissal of Imran’s bail plea in a case registered against him over May 9, 2023 violence, including an attack on the Jinnah House. The judge through a short order on July 9 had dismissed Imran’s bail plea.
The order stated that the statements of two prosecution witnesses revealed that Imran not only instigated the people but also gave the task of the attacks and arson, to create anarchy and law and order situation merely to pressure the military establishment and the then government for his release.
It added that the petitioner’s counsel Barrister Salman Safdar raised queries about the genuineness of the cases.
He pointed out that neither the names of those officials were disclosed, nor even mentioned in the first information report (FIR), which saw the petitioner, Imran, and other party leaders hatching a conspiracy. Barrister Salman Safdar also questioned why those officials avoided revealing this conspiracy before their high-ups if it was a conspiracy.
The detailed order stated that after perusing the record, the two prosecution witnesses recorded their statements under Section 161 CrPC, contending that petitioner Imran Khan held a meeting at Zaman Park with 15 senior PTI leaders on May 7, 2023, from 5:15 pm to 6:00 pm and told them that he had apprehension of him being arrested on May 9, 2023, in Islamabad.
On his arrest, they all, in the leadership of Dr. Yasmeen Rashid, would gather PTI workers and attack the military installations, government properties, and police officials to create pressure on the government and armed institutions for his release, Imran had instructed.
On that, the co-accused replied that he [Imran] was their redline, and they would jam the roads, instigating the PTI workers, according to the order.
Moreover, the order continued, and the petitioner on May 9, 2023, at the time of leaving for Islamabad also sent a video message. if I’m arrested, the condition of the country will worsen like that of Sri Lanka.
Another clip of the petitioner Imran Khan was also broadcast the whole day through the official Twitter account of the PTI on social media on May 9, 2023, to instigate the PTI workers to come out in protest and call it? Real Jehad for Real Freedom, Haqeeqi Azadi?.
The order stated that actually, the case of the prosecution against the petitioner was that he hatched the alleged criminal conspiracy, which was agreed by the top PTI leadership, and the same was conveyed through modern devices, especially online, to the protesters who in the result of the alleged instigation, launched an attack, entered forcibly in Jinnah House and set it on fire, waging war against the state, intending to overawe the government.
The recovery of alleged articles used for recording video messages of instigation was to be affected by the petitioner. The alleged malice of political victimization pleaded on behalf of the petitioner against the official complainant did not appear to be prudent mind, the order stated.
A peaceful demonstrator becomes a terrorist, when he hatches criminal conspiracy, disseminates it, and shares common objects with other accused, who begin the armed attack, attempt to damage or damage the state properties like Jinnah House, intending to jam government machinery, as per Section 6 of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997 and hence he lost his normal rights of a law-abiding citizen.
The order further stated that the investigation must not be interrupted as it would curtail the collection of the prosecution evidence. An extraordinary concession of pre-arrest bail was meant for an innocent person and not the petitioner who hatched, and materialized the alleged criminal conspiracy along with the senior PTI leadership and protestors, having the common object to wage war against the state to topple the government.
Finally, the ATC judge dismissed the bail plea of petitioner Imran Khan.
