TikTok Ban Threatened by Court Ruling
The decision is a major win for the Justice Department and opponents of the Chinese-owned app and a devastating blow to TikTok parent ByteDance. It significantly raises the prospects of an unprecedented ban in just six weeks on a social media app used by 170 million Americans.
TikTok plans to appeal the decision to the Supreme Court.
In detailing their support of the law, the appeals court noted it was the result of Republicans and Democrats working together, as well as two presidents, as “part of a broader effort to counter a well-substantiated national security threat posed by the PRC (People’s Republic of China).”
The Justice Department says under Chinese ownership, TikTok poses a threat because of its access to vast personal data of Americans, asserting China can covertly manipulate information that Americans consume via TikTok.
Attorney General Merrick Garland called the decision “an important step in blocking the Chinese government from weaponizing TikTok.”
But the Chinese Embassy in Washington called the law “a blatant act of commercial robbery” and warned the United States “must handle this case in a prudent manner to avoid harming the mutual trust between the two countries and the development of bilateral relations.”
The ruling comes amid growing trade tensions between the world’s two biggest economies after the administration of President Joe Biden placed new restrictions on China’s chip industry and Beijing responded by imposing an outright ban on exports of gallium, germanium, and antimony to the United States.
U.S. appeals court Judges Sri Srinivasan, Neomi Rao, and Douglas Ginsburg rejected legal challenges brought by TikTok and users against the law, which gives ByteDance until Jan. 19 to sell or divest TikTok’s U.S. assets or face a ban.
FREE SPEECH
“While today’s news is disappointing, rest assured we will continue the fight to protect free speech on our platform,” TikTok CEO Shou Zi Chew said in an email to staff seen by Reuters.
Free speech advocates quickly criticized the ruling. The American Civil Liberties Union said, “Banning TikTok blatantly violates the First Amendment rights of millions of Americans who use this app to express themselves and communicate with people around the world.”
In its analysis, the court said China, through its relationship with TikTok parent ByteDance, threatened to distort U.S. speech through TikTok and “manipulate public discourse.”
China’s “ability to do so is at odds with free speech fundamentals. Indeed, the First Amendment precludes a domestic government from exercising comparable control over a social media company in the United States.”
The decision — unless the Supreme Court reverses it — puts TikTok’s fate in the hands of first President Biden on whether to grant a 90-day extension of the Jan. 19 deadline to force a sale and then President-elect Donald Trump, who takes office on Jan. 20. But it’s not clear whether ByteDance could meet the heavy burden to show it had made significant progress toward a divestiture needed to trigger the extension — or if the Chinese government would approve any sale.
Trump, who unsuccessfully tried to ban TikTok during his first term in 2020, said before the November presidential election he would not allow the TikTok ban.
Friday’s decision upholds the law giving the U.S. government sweeping powers to ban other foreign-owned apps that could raise concerns about the collection of Americans’ data — and could open the door to a future crackdown on many other foreign-owned apps. In 2020, Trump also tried to ban Tencent-owned WeChat but was blocked by the courts.
Mutib Khalid is a skilled content writer and digital marketer with a knack for crafting compelling narratives and optimizing digital strategies. Excel in creating engaging content that drives results and enhances online presence. Passionate about blending creativity with data-driven approaches, Mutib Khalid helps brands connect with their audience and achieve their goals.
